The U.S. ad industry is big.
It accounts for more than 60% of global advertising revenue and accounts for nearly half of the global online ad spend.
And it’s growing at a blistering clip.
In the U.K., advertising is a big part of the economy and the national government.
But its growth has been uneven and unevenly shared between the states and cities.
So, for many advertisers, it’s a tough sell to see ads appear on local television stations in their own cities.
Advertising revenue is a large part of local economies.
And while there’s been a shift in the way advertising is being done in the U, the economics of local advertising are also changing.
It’s an issue that is still in its infancy.
“Local ads are being seen on a lot of things, and they are being paid for with advertising dollars,” said Jeffery Meeks, a professor of advertising at Stanford University.
“And in some cases they’re being paid with money from the government.”
Meeks and his colleague David Cope have written extensively about how local advertising can help cities and regions compete.
He believes that, for a lot, local advertising could be a solution for the country.
Local advertising has been used to help create jobs in some of the nation’s poorest areas, including Baltimore, Los Angeles and Seattle.
But it’s not a cure-all.
The idea that the city could find new ways to make a living from advertising is appealing to many people.
“There are many reasons for local ads to work,” Meeks said.
“I think they’re really good at delivering the message that you can’t buy things in the city, so why not use local advertising to make those kinds of things a lot more affordable and accessible to people.”
Local ads can be very expensive.
Many advertisers are trying to be as transparent as possible with their ads, to make sure they’re paid fairly.
They’re also trying to make their ads as effective as possible, so they can be seen by the right audience.
The ads aren’t just paid for through local channels.
Some are sponsored and others are paid by sponsors who pay them directly.
So a local radio station in Baltimore is a prime example of local ads.
The station broadcasts local radio advertising.
The advertising is paid for by the local government, which also pays for the radio station.
Local advertisers are also using local radio ads to get local support for projects like the Baltimore Inner Harbor Project.
“It is the only time that a city or a municipality can get their voice heard,” Macks said.
But, of course, local ads don’t always work out that way.
Meeks’ research suggests that local ads are often not good for local businesses.
For example, the advertising campaign that aired in Baltimore in February was part of a broader effort by the city to build a stronger economic base.
“When you look at the local advertising, they are very good at selling it to the wrong people,” he said.
For instance, a local television station in Los Angeles spent $25 million on advertising during the first two months of 2018.
That’s about three times as much as local TV ads were spent during the same period in 2017.
That said, some of that spending was in the form of local sponsorship.
But many local sponsorships are made with advertising money from outside the city.
That could be because sponsorships can be more expensive than local advertising.
Local ads also don’t necessarily have a direct impact on local businesses, according to Meeks.
Some ads are directed at businesses in other cities, but it’s very hard to know how much of the money is actually coming from the local business.
Local companies also often rely on advertising for part of their revenues, so it’s important to consider the impact of local advertisements on local business, Meeks added.
“The bigger picture, the local ads aren.
The smaller picture is local ads,” Mores said.
Mandy Zink, president and CEO of the American Institute of Architects, agrees that local advertising is great for local governments.
“In the end, local ad is really the only way to get the message across,” Zink said.
The problem with local ads isn’t necessarily that they’re expensive.
“A lot of the things that are being shown in ads are actually very cheap to produce,” she said.
Local television ads aren�t cheap, either.
Most local TV advertising costs about $50 million a year, which is a lot for the amount of money that is spent in a single day.
But Zink believes local advertising has the potential to create jobs and generate revenue for local communities.
“If we could make it work, I think we could,” Zinks said.